In a well-developed paragraph that includes a topic sentence, supporting details, and conclusion, respond to the following question: Which was more effective at telling the story of Jimmy Valentine, the text or the film version? Give your opinion, and then give details about each version to support your choice. Consider elements like characterization, setting, music, lighting, and emotional connection to the story.

I personally believe that the film version better tells the story of Jimmy Valentine. In a film, the characters are much more tangible. We can see what they look like and don't have to imagine. The film version better exaggerates the dramatic story and enables us to really feel along with the characters rather than just read along. The emotional scenes in the story are better portrayed in the film. In conclusion, the film version is better at telling the story of Jimmy Valentine because it gives us a palpable picture of the story and allows the audience to better follow the story in the shoes of the main characters.

Explanation:

Your Text Version.

Why:

In my opinion, the text version was more effective at telling the story of Jimmy Valentine. In the film version, they change the lighting and add in music that might alter the way you perceive the story. When you read the story it allows you to be involved with what is happening in your own way so you can follow along. In conclusion, the text version is better at telling the story because it provides enough details for you to imagine what’s happening on your own and adapt the story in your own way.

Hope this helps, Yuri!

나는 잘하고 있기 때문에 잘하고 있기를 바랍니다!

answer: group ii. when the root is a full word except for a final e, the forms usually are spelled with -able.

explanation: the word will be deplorable. -able will be used with the word 'deplore-'. the group ii is when the root is a full word except for a final e, the forms usually are spelled with -able is used for the word deplore- because the word deplore- has 'e' at the end of it.