Why do kids with cellphones cause a serious destruction mm

In a way, it's more of a distraction than a destruction.

If a teacher is presenting a lesson or conducting a discussion and many students are not participating because they are looking at their cellphone, it is likely that the teacher will have to stop the lesson to address the issue, and that distracts the students who were following along.

Or a family could be having conversations about the events of the day and what's going on in their lives but gets distracted by texts from outside, or twitter nonsense, games, etc.

Explanation:

So the discussion tends to be destroyed; the continuity is disrupted. Information and insights aren't shared. And the group, whether it's a class, a family, or a group of friends, suffers the loss of understanding, sharing and/or bonding because some kids' cellphones were more important.

d bc i just guessed

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.