Why is it not a good idea to rely on satire as your primary source of news? Satire is supposed to make you laugh-not think.

Satire can lead you to a flawed or biased understanding of events.

Satire, as a rule, never includes actual facts-only fictional details.

Satire is causing networks to cancel traditional news programming.

It is not a good idea to rely on satire as our primary source of news because:

B. Satire can lead you to a flawed or biased understanding of events.

Explanation:

Satire has the purpose of making people laugh, and then think. It is initially based on actual facts; however, to achieve its comic purpose, such facts may be distorted. For that reason, satire can lead to a biased understanding of events. It is not devoid of subjectivity. Quite the contrary, satire is permeated with opinions given from a certain perspective. Having that in mind, we can choose letter B. Satire can lead you to a flawed or biased understanding of events.

warren buffett- the oracle of omaha warren buffett came from a normal type of family in nebraska. when hew as young, he understood the value of investing money and gaining interest on that investment. he strived hard at several jobs, but what made him one of the wealthiest men in the world was his gift for allocating capital within a free market system. warren buffett is an example of a man whose wealth is owed largely to the free enterprise system. buffett was able to allocate his money however he wanted, investing in businesses that he thought could compete effectively. without the free market system, he would not have the right to invest however he wanted, and would not have become so wealthy.

second person

explanation:

note the heavy uses of "you", "your", as well as "he".

~