Read this sentence from the speech. In essence, what introducing the unpredictable grizzly bear
under the full protection of the Endangered Species Act
means is that this large area that we see blocked in this map
will experience a complete change in its lifestyle.
Which of these statements explains why the speaker's conclusion
could be considered invalid?
The speaker draws the audience's attention away from the real issues.
The speaker cites information that is not consistent with her main
ideas.
The speaker makes a sweeping generalization that may or may not be
true.
The speaker includes information that supports the wildlife officials'
position. HELP PLEASE ASAP

20 points plus brainlest answer if right. joe nesbo, a travelling salesman, was staying at a hotel for business. he was having a dinner meeting that night, so he decided to take a nap in the middle of the afternoon. he was awakened by a knock at the door, and then a man walked in. “oh my, i’m terribly sorry, this isn’t my room. , pardon the intrusion.” the man calmly backed out and left. nesbo got up and locked the door – something he forgot to do before his nap – and lay back down on the bed. but then he shot up in bed and called the lobby to tell them there was a burglar on the prowl. what made nesbo think that?

How can the rebuttal best address the counterclaim? read the claim and reason beginning in high school students should eam their own money by finding aher school employment. an aber school job seves not only as income, but as valuable experience for when students leave school for the workiorce. read the counterclaim and reason while having a source of income can certainly be a learning experience for high school students, they should maintain their focus on academics and extracurricular activities working atter school many experts agree, can lead to a decrease in school success which can then limit students' options when they enter the workforce the rebuttal should include examples of jobs that are available to students and the problems associated with those jobs the rebuttal should acknowledge that school remains a priority and discuss the benefits of a balance between school and work the rebuttal should address the need for a discussion on the matter by restating both points before reaching a conclusion the rebuttal should state a logical explanation for both opinions before granting credibility to the need for school to remain a priority

Answer 3 and 5 for brainliest. i don’t have a link for #3 sadly.