English, 10.01.2020 10:31 lilybear1700

Allen discriminates or distinguishes between what people should do and what they should be allowed to do. how does he reconcile this apparent contradiction in his argument?

Answers: 2

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: English

English, 21.06.2019 12:30, Theresab2021

Ilearned that to this unending torment have been condemned the sinners of the flesh, those who surrender reason to self-will. (v; l. 37-39) which identifies the best inference one could draw based upon the above excerpt?

Answers: 3

continue

English, 21.06.2019 21:50, needthehelp78

Question from select the correct answer. what argument is susan b. anthony making in the passage? a. male citizens created the laws to secure the rights of men, so legal reform is required to secure women’s rights. b. women are often punished for committing criminal acts that are pardoned when committed by men. c. women are judged under laws supposedly written only for males, so they are entitled to the same rights as males. d. the court judge modified the original documents to arrest and try anthony unfairly. has anyone else got this?

Answers: 3

continue

English, 22.06.2019 03:00, Latoyajenjins1789

Which words from the excerpt most contribute to the patriotic tone

Answers: 2

continue

English, 22.06.2019 04:00, zaiah329

Ill she not be here anon? is she not hurrying to upbraid me for my haste? have i not heard her footstep on the stair? do i not distinguish that heavy and horrible beating of her heart? what is the effect of parallelism in this excerpt? it emphasizes usher’s misunderstanding. it emphasizes usher’s love for his sister. it emphasizes usher’s psychological fixation. it emphasizes usher’s melancholy nature.

Answers: 2

continue

You know the right answer?

Allen discriminates or distinguishes between what people should do and what they should be allowed t...