With a partner, reread the previous texts about Michael Fay and look for evidence of fallacious reasoning. Provide evidence for why you think the reasoning is fallacious, and discuss how the writers could have changed their text to avoid these problems.

It is possible to perceive a fallacy, when the text shows that the government of singapore affirmed that the western countries do not have the right to interfere and impose their values on governments that manage themselves.

Explanation:

As you may know, fallacies are arguments issued as correct, but which present false and incorrect information. An example of fallacy can be seen in the article on Michael Fa, when the government of Singapore states that Western countries do not have the right to interfere in the punishment of countries that govern themselves (as Singapore), when it comes to criminals.

This fallacy shows that the government of singapore, in the struggle to assume its incorrect position in relation to Fay, does not recognize its mistakes and puts other countries as wrong.

the article is needed to answer the question from the oddessey

i think its,

b) the narrator's mental state is anguished.

happy to

pls mark as brainliest