HELP ME PLEASE! Find one more news story from one of the publications used earlier (The Economist, The Wall Street Journal, The New Republic, The Atlantic, Harper's Magazine, etc.) and complete one expository paragraph describing the information and providing one response to the event.

In the article released by The Atlantic titled, "The Bird That Builds Nests Right By Its Worst Enemy," by Larry Pynn and Hakai Magazine, Pynn informs the reader of the odd method of survival used by great blue herons, and how this method is helping to protect them against their population decline. According to Pynn, the population decline of the great blue herons has been a growing concern as the populations of bald eagles increases. Rob Butler explained that before eagle populations rose, the herons had "free reign", but as eagle populations started going up, they would "see them going into the colonies," which caused concern. As is explained by Pynn, the heron population has been slowly rekindling over the past few years, and it has been speculated that this may be in part due to their "unique nesting strategy," known as "the predator-protection hypothesis." By nesting close to a nesting pair of eagles, other eagles will be chased off, thus greatly reducing the loss seen in great blue heron populations. Pynn ends the article with a quote by Ross Vennesland, stating, " 'The optimistic voice thinks that maybe some sort of equilibrium is finally being reached between these long-dueling species.' "

Explanation:

The prompt wasn't overly specific, so I just found a random article and summarized it. This is a bit late for the person that posted this question, so I apologize, but hopefully it will help some other people. I got 100% on Edge 2021

"character is what you are in the dark." dwight lyman moody, in this very witty quotation of his, states we act and think differently when we are "in the dark", that is, when the spotlight is not on us and everyone can see us and consequently judge us. when reading, we tend to be sympathetic to some characters and their dilemmas. by being so, we are saying to ourselves that we agree with those characters' acts and choices, even if they are morally questionable if we have common sense in mind. dwight lyman moody's quotation applies very well to "crime and punishment", by   19th century russian writer fiodor dostoyevsky. raskolnikov, the main character, a former law student who spends his days reflecting upon life and its misery, draws a fatal conclusion: mankind is divided in two main categories: ordinary and extraordinary people. the first are the ones who lead a run-of-the-mill existence and are full of imperfections; the latter are the ones who are spiritually superior, the ones who always know better, and have the right to judge the ordinary ones, as well as eliminate them if for common good. raskolnikov considers himself as belonging to the extraordinary category and decides to kill an old lady who is a money lender and in whose house he rents a small room. raskolnikov compares himself to napoleon, who had the undeniable right to execute tons of people during the war in order to save his nation. of course what the main character decides to do is a horrendous crime, but as readers we feel it is the right thing for him to do, since the victim is a mean old woman who only thinks about money and keeps humiliating her younger sister. what one experiences is a mixture of sympathy and empathy for the character, even though he decides to commit homicide, which is not at all accepted or tolerated by civilized citizens. however, since readers are "in the dark", they allow themselves to feel in ways they would probably never dare to confess to anyone, no matter how nasty or vicious a character can be. after all, they are just reading and doing no harm. in other words, readers are in the dark and can be who they are without being judged.

i think descriptive but i'm not 100% sure.. sorry.