Write a short answer to each question. 1. Describe at least two ways Stalin uses logical fallacies or other forms of faulty argumentation. Back up your claims with evidence from his speech.

2. Why might Stalin's audience have believed him in spite of the weaknesses in his argument? Explain your answer.

3. Define panic-monger and describe its connotations. How does Stalin's use of the word affect his tone? How does the meaning of the word change with each repetition?

4. Identify the primary point Stalin makes in his speech, as well as at least one supporting point.

5. Which of Stalin's pathos appeals are designed to produce positive emotions in the audience, and which are designed to evoke negative emotions? Explain how both types of pathos appeals work together to make Stalin's speech persuasive

6. Describe how Stalin uses pathos in his arguments to manipulate his audience

Explanation:

In Emilio Gentile’s ‘Politics as Religion,’ Gentile describes the sacralising of Stalin’s regime in the following words:

The sacralization of the party opened the way to the sacralization of Stalin when he became the supreme leader.  After 1929, the political religion of Russia mainly concentrated on the deification of Stalin, who until his death in 1953 dominated the party and Soviet system like a tyrannical and merciless deity.

kenny´s more than 25 years of relevant public service. in the army for two decades, as official representative for four years, and now for the department of state, as ambassador. this career clearly demonstrates great capacities in the public sector.

emerson essentially believes that traveling is overrated. he supports this perspective through an initial focus on "the idea" of places like italy, england, and egypt, and the fascination of "educated americans" with them. he argues that those places only took on the grand, majestic ideas that they represent because "they who made england, italy, or greece venerable in the imagination did so by sticking fast where they were, like an axis of the earth." yes, those places are grand, but only because they so clearly represent the places that they are. the art and culture of italy, england, and egypt is authentic, and therefore significant.

plz mark brainliest