A reader can best combine the information in the excerpts to
O understand the relief felt by the Grumman folks at
Read the excerpts from Team Moon and the NASA
article.
And only now-a solid, panic-stricken, gut-wrenching,
heart-palpitating ten minutes by clock but feeling like
an eternity later-did it sink in for John Coursen, Tom
Kelly, and a lot of the other Grumman folks who had
poured years of their lives into building the lunar
module: Their baby was on the moon. Let the cheering
begin!
Mission control when the lunar module was safely on
the moon.
O understand what Aldrin and Armstrong did for two
and half hours after landing the lunar module on the
moon.
O understand the thrill of the lunar module's landing
from both the perspectives of mission control and the
astronauts.
Aldrin joins [Armstrong] shortly, and offers a simple but
powerful description of the lunar surface: "magnificent
desolation." They explore the surface for two and a
half hours, collecting samples and taking photographs.
O understand the moon landing from the perspectives
of people watching the events unfold on their home
televisions.

both the address and the poster use diction to convey their message. diction is defined as a style of writing or speaking based on the types of words chosen in order to send a message. parallelism is when a similar sentence structure is used for several sentences on a text; roosevelt's address doesn't follow that. repetition has to do with repeating a word or sentence in order to emphasize and idea, however neither the poster nor the address use repetion. finally, the address doesn't use images to convey a message.

d. pushing his plate away from the edge of the table idk what the other guy was trying to

explanation:

the intellectual community is a place like a university where people with high marks, or original thought or an outstanding interest in something gather. they take classes together. they discuss things. they argue sometimes, and not always in a friendly way. but if they argue, it is because they are passionate about something, and there is nothing the matter with that.

lately i've been hearing rumors that it is not the way it was when i went to school. the one thing all schools used to have was free speech. the 1st amendment rights were sacred. now i'm hearing they are not. students can be reported and disciplined for giving an off the wall opinion.

that is shameful.

intellectual ideas are meant to be discussed. they are meant to be chewed up and worked on. that is the primary responsibility of every intellectual community. if that is not the way it is, then that is not a school to go to.

social media, in my opinion, and this is just an opinion. i wouldn't take it too seriously, complicates everything to do with human communication. you can want to share things and others feel they have the right to be very critical or sarcastic or mean about what you share. lack of respect is an immeasurable intolerable condition and social media abounds with that sort of thing.

one of the things i really like about is how careful people are because they must have some idea that the mods are exactly what the word says they are. they police this board very well, and what is so remarkable about them is that they are no older than the average grade 12 student.

my hat goes off to them (which means i respect them quite a bit).

answer is b,

"the tracer looks harmless in flight, but the pilot’s bitten lips and white knuckles suggest how dangerous it can be."

it was correct.