Write an essay that analyzes how a text explains the sequence of events that affected the discovery of the Rosetta stone. PLEASE ACTUALLY HELP ME THIS IS 10 ASSIGNMENTS OVERDUE I WAS CRYING I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST AND ITS 100 PONTS !! ! IF U R LOOKING FOR FR EE POI NTS GO ON MY OTHER QUESTIONS !!!

writing prompt--
write an essay that analyzes how a text explains the sequence of events that affected the discovery of the Rosetta Stone.

Product: What will you write?
An analytical essay
Topic: What will you write about?
How text events lead to the discovery of the Rosetta Stone
Audience: Who?
Peers and adults
Purpose: Why will you write?
To analyze
So basically you have to write an essay determining if James Cross Giblin presents information effectively in his book “Riddle of the Rosetta Stone”. A thesis statement you could use is: GIBLIN PRESENTS INFORMATION EFFECTIVELY.
You have to have an introductory paragraph that includes your thesis, a body which explains why he presents the information effectively (use QUOTES FROM THE TEXT), and a conclusion to sum it all up.

WILL PROVIDE ALL NOTES I HAVE ON THE ESSAY IN THE COMMENTS PLS CHECK THOSE OUT! AND IF YOU ARE LOOKING FOR FREE POINTS AND DONT ACTUALLY WANT TO HELP ME OUT , GO TO MY OTHER QUESTIONS ON MY PROFILE. !!!

DONT GO TO ᵇʳᵃⁱⁿˡʸ.ᵗᵒᵈᵃʸ THEY WILL HACK YOU. THEY WILL SCAM YOU! THEY HAVE WEIRD PICS DONT GO THERE! PLEASE SPREAD THE WORD!

In 1799, when Napoleon’s army was dismantling a wall in Rashid, Egypt, they discovered the Rosetta Stone. Little did they know that this 11-inch thick piece of rock would be one of the greatest discoveries in history! It contained Egyptian scripture, with Greek also on the stone. This was used to decode the once lost Egyptian writing system. Before the 1800’s, attempts at trying to uncover the secrets held by the ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics found on walls inside numerous tombs were useless. The pictures were falsely believed to be symbolic, representing some sort of object or idea. Something soon changed all of this misconception. 1799 was the year of a great breakthrough in Egyptology. French troops, under…show more content…

Another man who devoted many years of his life to studying the stone was Jean-Francois Champollion. After many years of perseverance, Champollion finally translated the stone in 1822. He accomplished this feat by first recognizing that hieroglyphs were not symbols, but instead were associated with phonetics, as Thomas Young had proved. (Andrews 166) His first major breakthrough in his studies was in 1808, when he resolved those fifteen signs of the demotic script related with alphabetic letters from the Coptic language. From this he concluded that Coptic language must be based on the remnants of the last of the ancient Egyptian language, and written with the Greek alphabet, which is why it was readable to Champollion and other scholars researching the stone. Also, that the hieroglyphic text was a translation of the Greek, not the reverse, as had been previously believed. By 1818, Champollion had successfully concluded that though some signs were basically ideograms, many of the glyphs had phonetic value, meaning the ancient Egyptian script was at least partially alphabetic.

Explanation:

i guess you are missing the idea that has to be supported, am i right?