After watching "The Lost Boys of Sudan" Feature Film and reading the article on "The Lost Boys of Sudan", provide an argument explaining the effectiveness of one of the sources over the other. Provide at least two pieces of evidence from EACH source to support your responses.

The feature film is a more efficient source.

Explanation:

While both sources are effective in portraying the suffering and dangerous life that the lost boys in Sudan have had to endure, the feature film does this more efficiently. This is because, the feature film presents itself as a less tiring source to be absorbed, since watching can be more attractive and less tiring than reading, at certain times. In addition, the article encourages reasoning and the creation of mental images through the words and facts presented in the text. However, in the feature film the images are already created and presented to the viewer who does not need to reason, because the information has already been delivered ready.

In this case, the feature film is more efficient because it promotes practicality of thought, in addition to providing mental images.

i it is b. but if its not sorry

compare & contrast informative essay/speech

when speaking or writing for the sole purpose of providing information in order to give audience members a good basis for making a decision, you would present an informative speech or essay.   because you wouldn’t want to be persuading the audience by arguing for one type of exercise over the other, you wouldn’t choose a persuasive/argumentative technique.   to fairly, and without bias, present information about the pros and cons of each type exercise, a compare/contrast, informative speech/essay would be the best bet.