Which detail best supports the inference that James Watt could not have made the improvement to his steam engine WILHOULD Matthew Boulton?
The Steam Engine
James Watt, who secured the position as a maker of scientific instruments in the University of Glasgow, proposed an idea for improving the
existing steam engine, which was used for pumping mines. For a long time, owing to a lack of money, he had difficulty in establishing the merits
of his improvements. Finally, he formed a partnership with Matthew Boulton, a wealthy and energetic man who lived at Birmingham, England,
They began the manufacture of steam engines at Birmingham, under the firm name of Boulton and Watt. This partnership was very successful
Watt supplied the inventions, Boulton furnished the money and attended to the business,
Before the time of Watt, the steam engine was exclusively a steam pump-slow and wasteful of fuel. Watt made it a quick, powerful, and
efficient engine, requiring only a fourth as much fuel as before. Under his first patent, the engine was still used only as a steam pump, but his
later improvements adapted it for driving stationary machinery of all kinds. The commercial success of his engine was soon fully established.

the apollo program, also known as project apollo, was the third united states human spaceflight program carried out by the national aeronautics and space administration (nasa), which succeeded in landing the first humans on the moon from 1969 to 1972.

both inform the reader that faryad and liaqat were not given the chance to tell their version of events at the police station.

hope this

yes it did. that's been proven time and again. i used to be an elementary school teacher myself, and i worked with thousands of kids with cerebral palsy across the nation and in canada. what i observed was that children with dyslexia were struggling to read and learn. it was a serious issue that impacted teachers all over the country, but it was so often ignored and denied.

and children with disabilities – children who have learning disabilities – they got to spend a lot of time reading in a classroom.

i could not believe there was never any kind of conversation in my school about how to provide more opportunities for students with disabilities. the education system was still looking for ways to keep the pressure on children's teachers to improve their grades, that they have to be teachers who were in the grade for eight years, and they weren't even being evaluated.

so why weren't parents or guardians concerned about whether their kids were being by this system, if they could not see their kids in a classroom that they could improve? why couldn't you say, "i think you need to improve your reading skills," right? and they certainly believed it when i pointed it out to them. it doesn't matter if you said, "you need to go to an optometry class, or to a teacher's camp