PLS revise and grammaratize asap pls Have you ever thought jellyfish were bad? Imagine a swarm of jellyfish came at you. What would you do? Jellyfish are becoming a concern; they are swarming fishing nets and affecting power plant pipes. These fish have reduced the number of fish and are clogging power plant pipes. These fish pose a threat to our economy, what will we do about it?

The jellyfish has ruined fish harvesting and drastically decreased fish numbers. The jellyfish have affected the fish population and ruined the power plants. The jellyfish sting and harm the fish, so they are swarming the fish away. The jellyfish continue to clog the pipes in the power plants, so they are forced to shut down the plant.

The fish have caused many problems for fishers and for power plant workers. The fish are dangerous and are becoming the pests of the ocean. The solution to some of these problems are to use some extra precaution and smaller nets. These fish are a harmful and pesty problem for today's Economy. The workers should not be the people to worry about the jellyfish.

The major solution to this problem is to cut down on pollution. The reason for this is so the jellyfish have nothing to feed on. The reason for these swarms and clogging is because the jellyfish feed on the trash and pollution. These fish are a threat to our economy and are a danger to humans and animals. The jellyfish solution should be started immediately.

The jellyfish problem should be solved soon because if it doesn’t the jellyfish will take over. The jellyfish could continue to harm the fish and clog the power plant pipes. The problem will continue if we don’t do anything about it. Jellyfish are an example of the economy's many large problems, will this problem end the same?

Read the passage. excerpt from "why equal pay is worth fighting for" by senator elizabeth warren, april 17, 2014 i honestly can't believe that we're still arguing over equal pay in 2014. when i started teaching elementary school after college, the public school district didn't hide the fact that it had two pay scales: one for men and one for women. women have made incredible strides since then. but 40 years later, we're still debating equal pay for equal work. women today still earn only 77 cents for every dollar a man earns, and they're taking a hit in nearly every occupation. bloomberg analyzed census data and found that median earnings for women were lower than those for men in 264 of 265 major occupation categories. in 99.6 percent of occupations, men get paid more than women. that's not an accident; that's discrimination. the effects of this discrimination are real, and they are long lasting. today, more young women go to college than men, but unequal pay makes it harder for them to pay back student loans. pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women. . for middle-class families today, it usually takes two incomes to get by, and many families depend as much on mom's salary as they do on dad's, if not more. women are the main breadwinners, or joint breadwinners, in two-thirds of the families across the country, and pay discrimination makes it that much harder for these families to stay afloat. women are ready to fight back against pay discrimination, but it's not easy. today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes. here in the senate, sen. barbara mikulski (d-md.) introduced the paycheck fairness act to give women the tools to combat wage discrimination. it would ensure that salary differences have something to do with the actual job that they are doing, and not just because they are women. senator warren states that the effects of pay discrimination are long-lasting. is this a valid argument supported by accurate evidence? no; warren weakens her point by claiming that the paycheck fairness act would "give women the tools to combat wage discrimination." yes; warren supports her point by noting, "for middle-class families today, it usually takes two incomes to get by." yes; warren supports her point by noting, "pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women." no; warren weakens her point by noting, "today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes."