Which is more important: freedom or security? Do you believe there is a way to have both freedom and security when it comes to speech? Cite evidence from this text, your own experience, and other literature, art, or history in your answer.

National security is an essential factor of any functioning society, but freedom is just as important.After 9/11, security in America was taken to a new level with increased airport safety procedures, a stronger border control, and new security acts being passed.The government did need to take action, such as enforcing stricter airport regulations to better monitor who enters the country. However, they did not need to infringe on American freedoms that were fought so hard for during the Revolutionary War.The USA Patriot Act of 2001 increased the ability of law enforcement officials to search personal information such as telephone calls, e-mails and personal records. It also eased restrictions on foreign intelligence gathering within the United States.While some aspects of the act are necessary, others are not.The Fourth Amendment ensures "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures." Listening in on phone calls and going through people's personal e-mails is unreasonable because it will not make America a safer place to live and it infringes on the freedoms the Fourth Amendment guarantees.U.S. intelligence analysts were ordered to continue monitoring phone calls, even when it was clear they posed no threat to America's safety."We identified phone numbers belonging to non-threatening groups, including the Red Cross," said Adrienne Kinne, a former Arab linguist who worked at a National Security Agency facility at Fort Gordon from 2001 to 2003. "We could have blocked their numbers, but we didn't, and we were told to listen to them just in case."American freedoms were being sacrificed to provide security, even when there was no real danger. The people whose phone calls were being monitored posed no threat to America. This was an invasion of their rights as American citizens.Freedom and security need to be balanced, but freedom should not be jeopardized in order to obtain security.In the beginning, America invested in freedom, not the security of what its citizens already knew. And while both are vital to the success of a nation, freedom is the more fundamental, more enduring, and, therefore, more important.Some may argue that, given the current threats to America, the security of the country and its people should take priority over freedoms, no matter the cost.While there are threats to be concerned about, taking away the liberty of the citizens for the sake of security is just giving in to what the terrorists ultimately want: the suppression of America and its people.These acts were supposed to secure the country and offer more protection in the tumultuous atmosphere of World War I. In reality, they not only failed but they tightened the grip that fear held on the nation. Beyond this, the acts dramatically infringed on First Amendment rights, the freedoms that are deeply ingrained in America.And while the freedom versus security debate is centuries old and circumstances have changed countless times, the dilemma is still the same. In a nation where freedom has had such a high value even before the country's birth, it is nearly impossible to place security before liberty.I consider security to be more important than freedom. For a small group of students in my school, the thoughts concerning this topic are so drastically different that it is our policy to refuse to discuss it with others when we know it will start an argument.Freedom and security do not necessarily refer to matters of national importance. They can be used in many situations. For example, when looking for a job, some people consider how secure they will be having a routine 9 to 5 job with little change in schedule. This ensures that their daily needs will be taken care of and they don't need to worry about those.Another extremely important thing having to do with security is a person's romantic relationships. Is it better to date exclusively and to have a steady boyfriend or girlfriend, or to be free to come and go as you please without having a steady relationship in your life? Personally, I'd like to think that because something like marriage exists, security is considered significantly more important to most individuals.

Some people may think that life is pointless if you aren't free to enjoy it. But I disagree. What's the point of being free if you have to live with the constant uncertainty and worry that's caused by a lack of security?

concepts for wave energy have existed since the 1800s, anyway current wave technology started during the 1940s with the tests of researcher yoshio masuda. financing into wave energy technology has as of late expanded because of the requirement for renewable energy sources. the principal wave power plant on the planet opened in 2008 at the agucadoura wave homestead in portugal. tidal power to turn water haggles grains was utilized as far back as roman occasions and the medieval times. using tidal power for power is genuinely later, however the expenses have been too high to even consider making it a noteworthy energy source. ongoing mechanical advances have demonstrated that it could turn into a focused and feasible source. it is obscure precisely how exorbitant the venture would be; in any case, it is evaluated at around $16 billion. it is anticipated that the undertaking will take 9 years to assemble. hydroelectric energy would be accommodated the uk, and this is perfect and maintainable. there would likewise be wind generators on the blast, which would give progressively renewable energy to the uk. this would imply that less fossil fuels will be utilized, thusly lessening co2 discharges and diminishing the effect of global warming. it would assist the uk with meeting the kyoto convention co2 emanation focus by diminishing the (by 2020). be that as it may, there are an assortment of animal groups in the severn estuary where the blast will be fabricated, and their natural surroundings will be pulverized if the prepares. "the entire of the severn estuary is home to nearly 65,000 different types of water and swimming feathered creatures. it is a site of logical intrigue" said martin splash. the severn estuary is significant for the transient fish that go through the estuary on their approach to crisp water generating locales. the between tidal area gives nourishment to more than 85,00 water winged creatures, and speaks to 7% of the all out uk's estuaries-and this area would be upset by the structure of the torrent. the torrent would probably cause seaside disintegration in areas, for example, level holm-and this would diminish living spaces. additionally, individuals state that the torrent would be a blemish, and ruin the nearby scene because of the enormous measure of cement and the breeze turbines on the top.the area is useful for structure the power plant in light of the fact that during spring tides, the tide plentifulness can achieve 11 meters (36 feet). likewise, the gulf is a limited 15 kilometers (9 miles) crosswise over at the area proposed, and the site could lessen coal discharges in the area by 3 percent by supplanting fossil fuel power. tidal power plants should be worked in areas that reason directing of tidal water. the thin opening to a cove, for instance, will constrain the tidal waters to rise and fall quickly. this will make the waters stream through at an extraordinary speed. a fitting area should likewise have an enormous change among elevated and low tides. at the very least, there ought to be a distinction of 5 meters. a tidal power plant worked in such an area will be exceptionally productive at creating power. utilizing tide for power is productive in light of the fact that a great deal of electrical power is created. tidal power plants are equipped for changing over the development of water into usable power. tides give a standout amongst the most steady wellsprings of energy. review that tides are brought about by the gravitational powers of the sun and the moon. in contrast to fossil or atomic fuels, tidal power utilizes a boundless wellspring of energy as its info. it tends to be over the top expensive to fabricate the tidal power plant structure at first. in any case, when the underlying structure is fabricated the fuel is consistent and unsurprising. presently, here are some intriguing realities about tidal power plants. tidal turbines are more costly to construct and keep up than wind turbines, yet produce more energy. they additionally produce energy all the more reliably as the tide is ceaseless while the breeze doesn't generally blow. wave and tidal energy converters are situated close to the coastline. it is simpler to introduce, keep up, catch the energy, and recover the energy when they are found near the coast. the us has no tidal power plants. at long last, there are two existing enormous tidal floods on the planet today. one is in france and the other in canada.

sincerely,

buckster buckswood

maybe i could if you provided more information, such as a image of the text? (;