subject
English, 18.11.2020 03:20 arnold2619

Conner and Harper disagree about who the audience for the speech really is. How did the disagreement come about, and how does the group resolve this discussion point and move on to understand the speech more fully while following the rules for collegial discussions and defining individual roles within the group? How do group members acknowledge new information expressed by others and qualify or justify their own views in light of the evidence presented?

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 22.06.2019 03:30, michaelponderjr2515
How is the word laud and welcome different
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 05:00, gutierrezforlife8220
Where do i find advocacy articles for 2.04 english 4? this is for the first amendment.
Answers: 3
image
English, 22.06.2019 07:00, spookymod4845
What is the most likely reason schlosser uses a direct quotation in this example excerpt from fast food nation
Answers: 2
image
English, 22.06.2019 08:30, h0ttmomma92002
"such has been the patient suffrence of these colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to after their former systems of government. the history of the present king of great britain is a history of reapeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishedment of an absolute tyranny over these states." which statement best describes the excerpt
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Conner and Harper disagree about who the audience for the speech really is. How did the disagreement...

Questions in other subjects: