Our society tends to value the individual and her or his experiences. However, certain natural physical appetites and pleasures are viewed as negative. Do we, in our modern society, want to do away with “passion?” Do we tend to be moralists, immoralists, or something in between? (Use evidence found in the text of Morality as Anti-Nature by Friedrich Nietzsche to support your answer.)

Based on the information given, it can be noted that people are neither moralists nor immoralists but they tend to be something in between.

Morality as anti-nature simply means a careful argument that stated that moral pronouncements by religions are designed in order to stifle the natural behavior of people.

According to the author, it was stated that people are neither moralists nor immoralists but they tend to be something in between. When people go to religious centers like churches or mosques, they put on their best behaviors but this may be a misconception of who they truly are.

Learn more about a society on:

link

hello!

your answer is a. ethical, emotional, and rational.

in order for someone to believe what you say it has to be ethical (morally correct). it should appeal to their emotions, and it must be rationally approving.

also, the other answer is incorrect.

hope this !

mark me brainliest!

have a great day!

~courtney

11 d

12 a

13 d

14 b

explanation: