Which statement best compares the ways that the two arguments use appeals?
O A. Passage 1 appeals to logic by giving facts about Gordon's
background, while passage 2 appeals to emotion by referencing
the audience's shared experience
O B. Passage 1 appeals to emotion by drawing on positive feelings of
friendship, while passage 2 appeals to logic by listing facts
without explaining why they are important
O C. Possage 1 appeals to ethics by talking about the speaker's
friendship with Gordon, while passage 2 appeals to logic by citing
facts about Gordon's accomplishments
O D. Passage 1 appeals to ethics by citing the speaker's deep
knowledge of Gordon's character, while passage 2 appeals to
emotion by emphasizing the audience's school spirit this goes with the 2 passages

Consider tim o’brien’s story "ambush." what differences do you see between how o’brien dealt with killing an enemy soldier in the moment of battle compared to looking back on the moment later in life? what might this contrast reveal about the effects of war?

What lines in this expert from act v of shakespeare’s romeo and juliet create dramatic irony

Which excerpt from chapter 3 of the strange case of dr. jekyll and mr. hyde illustrates a character vs. character conflict? hosts loved to detain the dry lawyer, when the light-hearted and loose-tongued had already their foot on the threshold; they liked to sit a while in his unobtrusive company. the large handsome face of dr. jekyll grew pale to the very lips, and there came a blackness about his eyes. “i do not care to hear more,” said he. “this is a matter i thought we had agreed to drop.” “my good utterson,” said the doctor, “this is very good of you, this is downright good of you, and i cannot find words to you in. i believe you fully; i would trust you before any man alive, ay, before myself.” but i do sincerely take a great, a very great interest in that young man; and if i am taken away, utterson, i wish you to promise me that you will bear with him and get his rights for him.”