Now, knowing what this story is really about, why did the author leave us with such ambiguity about why Father Hooper chose to wear the veil in the first place? This ambiguity begs us to question something about ourselves. What is it?

How are the two arguments made in the passages different? a. the first passage claims that pets in class will children with health problems; the second passage says pets will make some health problems worse. b. the first passage claims that students’ nervousness will decrease around pets; the second says that students’ nervousness will increase around pets. c. the first passage claims that pets will make the teacher’s work easier by keeping students busy; the second passage says pets will make the teacher’s work harder. d. the first passage claims that pets in school will be good for kids’ mental health; the second passage says pets will be bad for kids’ mental health.

Would the essay be more or less effective in explaining the concept of dead reckoning if you knew from the beginning that ahmed is an ant?

Whos a good poet to listen to? i got back into shane koyczan and i'm wondering if anything else is out there.