Read the excerpt from "A Case for Restricting Hate Speech," by Laura Beth Nielsen.
What is the purpose of Nielsen's repetition of the word
harm?

These negative physical and mental health outcomes
-- which embody the historical roots of race and
gender oppression-mean that hate speech is not "just
speech." Hate speech is doing something. It results in
tangible harms that are serious in and of themselves
and that collectively amount to the harm of
subordination. The harm of perpetuating
discrimination. The harm of creating inequality.
to emphasize the very real damage hate speech
inflicts
O to show how many people repeatedly use hate
speech against others
to detail the negative physical health outcomes that
arise from hate speech
O to demonstrate that inequality hurts those suffering
from gender and race oppression
Save and it

hello, never fear the humanspider is here!

answer: this is what i could find because i never done this work before.

it's likely the answer would be c.

- a - you could speak slowly, but if you used the same humor and a higher complexity or the same level of complexity, they might understand what to do.

- b - the humor presented might not be understandable to the 1st graders.

- d - explaining where peanut butter comes from is irrelevant to the homeeco class.

**c - by adjusting the level of complexity, you are going to a point of talking where everybody understands you, if you what i'm saying.**

note: if you loved this answer click that cool mark brainliest button buddy!

~

your friendly neighborhood human spider.

i would say the correct answer is not concrete.

osaka, a gorgeous place to live, extraordinary sights, and a wonderful place to visit for vacation. watching nature change there it is a lovely experience i would like.

explanation:

i ain't gonna write your whole essay for you at least you have a starter

sorry i ain't gonna do the whole assignment for your class or whatever