How is the topic of conflict represented differently in the two texts? a. The painting emphasizes the contrast between American and Mexican culture, whereas in the
poem, the speaker emphasizes the lack of acceptance by either culture.
b. In the poem, the speaker expresses a strong desire to be back in Mexico, whereas in the
painting, Kahlo emphasizes the lack of acceptance by either culture.
c. In the painting, Kahlo emphasizes the conflict between industry and nature, whereas in the
poem, the speaker minimizes the differences between the two cultures.
d. The poem emphasizes the speaker's rejection of the judgements placed on her, whereas in the
painting, Kahlo accepts the rejection she feels from America

no,

explanation:

because they are likely to use their corrupted thought process to get what they want. not what is better for the another reason they shouldn't is since they abused their rights as a us citizen they should have certain rights stripped away from them as punishment, such as the right to vote. due to the lack of proper behavior exemplified   from their actions , it would be hard for people to trust them because of their criminal record.   either directly (in the case of a referendum or ballot initiative) or indirectly (by choosing lawmakers and law enforcers). in fact, we do have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility and commitment to our laws that we require people to meet before they are given a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. people who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don’t meet those standards. and those crimes can include such “non-violent felonies” as, say, treason and espionage, or voter fraud and public corruption, white-collar crime and felonies merely “concerning drugs” — like trafficking in fentanyl-laced heroin and selling it to minors, for example. if you’re not willing to follow the law, then you should not have a role in making the law for everyone else.

i think its a bad thing why? one word flood