Is an eye for an eye a good basis for determining an appropriate punishment why or why not Please write 4 sentences

Yes.

Explanation: It is appropriate punishment because its fair for the other person if they both do wrong, although, it wouldn't be fair to another person if they did nothing wrong.

No

Explanation:

From the perspective of modern criminal law, a punishment has multiple purposes—not only to punish the criminal, but to help the victim recover from loss and protect the community from further harm. “An eye for an eye” punishment may sound like a fair punishment in the sense that the criminal suffers what the victim went through. However, it is not a good basis for determining a punishment because it focuses all its attention on getting revenge and fails to consider restitution and rehabilitation.

hello, never fear the humanspider is here!

answer: this is what i could find because i never done this work before.

it's likely the answer would be c.

- a - you could speak slowly, but if you used the same humor and a higher complexity or the same level of complexity, they might understand what to do.

- b - the humor presented might not be understandable to the 1st graders.

- d - explaining where peanut butter comes from is irrelevant to the homeeco class.

**c - by adjusting the level of complexity, you are going to a point of talking where everybody understands you, if you what i'm saying.**

note: if you loved this answer click that cool mark brainliest button buddy!

~

your friendly neighborhood human spider.