How is an article written 50 years after an event different from an article written one year after the event?

It can reflect on the long-term impact of the event.

It can summarize the details of the event chronologically.

It can show the immediate reactions of the people involved.

It can provide lots of specific details about the event.

It can reflect on the long-term impact of the event.

Explanation:

An article that is written so long after an event happened, is able to show the long term effects of the event because it would be able to include events that happened in the 50 years after the event in question has happened.

An article written only a year afterwards however, will be unable to talk about the long term impact of the event and will be more focused on the relatively immediate impacts of the event.

For instance, an article about the Civil Rights Act written in 1965 would be unable to talk about the long term impact of the Act as opposed to an article written in 2014 that will show such for instance how Southern States fought the Act.

what is the question that you are asking

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)