Analyze how Ambrose Bierce uses shifts in language to make a statement about the nature of war in "An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge." Make sure to add commentary,
transitions, and citations for a well devolved paragraph that is, at minimum, 100 words.
Topic sentence
. Claim evidence (what is the point of view and evidence to support that)
. Commentary (how does this point of view show the nature of war)
• Claim evidence (what is the point of view and evidence to support that)
. Commentary (how does this point of view show the nature of war)
Claim evidence (what is the point of view and evidence to support that)
. Commentary (how does this point of view show the nature of war)
. Claim evidence (what is the point of view and evidence to support that)
Commentary(how does this point of view show the nature of war)
Concluding sentence

In this excerpt from "dover beach" by matthew arnold, which two lines or sets of lines suggest that the speaker has undergone a loss of faith? the sea of faith was once, too, at the full, and round earth's shore lay like the folds of a bright girdle furled. but now i only hear its melancholy, long, withdrawing roar, retreating, to the breath of the night-wind, down the vast edges drear and naked shingles of the world. ah, love, let us be true to one another! for the world, which seems to lie before us like a land of dreams, so various, so beautiful, so new, hath really neither joy, nor love, nor light, nor certitude, nor peace, nor for pain; and we are here as on a darkling plain swept with confused alarms of struggle and flight, where ignorant armies clash by night.

What do mcmahon’s references to thomas carlyle and john stuart mill do for his own image and credibility?

What is darrow’s main argument and the claims he makes in this excerpt? a. darrow argues that even if the boys are horrible monsters, their deaths will not solve the problems of society; he claims that society wants the boys to be executed because people enjoy watching public executions. b. he argues that the people who should be held responsible for the crime are leopold’s and loeb’s parents since they neglected their sons; he claims that leopold and loeb were jealous of the boy they killed because he had expensive belongings they could not afford. c. darrow argues that the boys should not face the death penalty; he claims they both suffer from mental illnesses that make them unable to tell the difference between a dream and reality. d. he argues that leopold and loeb, particularly dickie loeb, should not be executed; he claims they were teenagers who didn’t have proper adult guidance, so they are not responsible for what they did.