Eric is conducting research about the exploration of Antarctica, and he has gathered these resources: • a diary written by someone who has traveled to Antarctica twice
• a brochure printed by a cruise ship advertising trips to Antarctica
• a government website listing regulations for exploring Antarctica
• an interview with a group interested in mining for gold in Antarctica

Which resource is likely to be most credible and why?

A diary written by someone who has traveled to Antarctica, because this person has actually visited Antarctica.
A brochure printed by a cruise ship that travels to Antarctica, because it is illegal for a company to print inaccurate information.
A government website listing regulations for exploring Antarctica, because governmental sources must provide accurate information.
An interview with a group interested in mining for gold in Antarctica, because its members feel strongly about what they want to do.

a government website listing regulations for exploring Antarctica

Explanation:

There is more reliable information on this.

the speech this question is referring to is president kennedy's special message to the congress on urgent national needs, may 25, 1961

kennedy responds in a very direct and concrete way to those thinking that communism is a positive system:

"yet their aggression is more often concealed than open. they have fired no missiles; and their troops are seldom seen. they send arms, agitators, aid, technicians and propaganda to every troubled area. but where fighting is required, it is usually done by others--by guerrillas striking at night, by assassins striking alone--assassins who have taken the lives of four thousand civil officers in the last twelve months in vietnam alone--by subversives and saboteurs and insurrectionists, who in some cases control whole areas inside of independent nations." (kennedy)

president kennedy presents communism as cowardly, as a hidden and treacherous weapon that strikes from the shadows like thieves, he represents the system as not even being capable of showing and open and overt attack or confrontation. to finish up the response, he expresses that the system attacks even a country's idependence and freedom.

i am confused, i do not see a speech unless you mean the

question