3. Give several examples of how Jiménez appeals
the different senses by effective use of image...
![subject](/tpl/images/cats/en.png)
English, 19.10.2020 01:01 raymondanthony3314
3. Give several examples of how Jiménez appeals
the different senses by effective use of imagery
![ansver](/tpl/images/cats/User.png)
Answers: 3
![](/tpl/images/ask_question.png)
![](/tpl/images/ask_question_mob.png)
Other questions on the subject: English
![image](/tpl/images/cats/en.png)
![image](/tpl/images/cats/en.png)
English, 22.06.2019 09:30, tumadreeve7852
One conclusion that a reader might draw from the excerpt from "there's a man in the habit of hitting me on the head with an umbrella" is that the man with the umbrella is persistent in his mission. provide two details from the text to support this conclusion.
Answers: 3
![image](/tpl/images/cats/en.png)
![image](/tpl/images/cats/en.png)
English, 22.06.2019 14:00, gabriellabadon2
Read the passage from the opinion of the court in dred scott v. sandford, written by justice taney. the question then arises, whether the provisions of the constitution, in relation to the personal rights and privileges to which the citizen of a state should be entitled, embraced the negro african race, at that time in this country, or who might afterwards be imported, who had then or should afterwards be made free in any state; and to put it in the power of a single state to make him a citizen of the united states, and endue him with the full rights of citizenship in every other state without their consent? does the constitution of the united states act upon him whenever he shall be made free under the laws of a state, and raised there to the rank of a citizen, and immediately clothe him with all the privileges of a citizen in every other state, and in its own courts? the court thinks the affirmative of these propositions cannot be maintained. and if it cannot, the plaintiff in error could not be a citizen of the state of missouri, within the meaning of the constitution of the united states, and, consequently, was not entitled to sue in its courts. what claim does justice taney make in this passage? that sanford has the right to enslave scott that scott has the right to be emancipated that scott is not a citizen of missouri that sanford cannot sue because he is not a citizen
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Questions in other subjects:
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/mat.png)
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/mat.png)
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/en.png)
English, 19.12.2020 21:30
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/istoriya.png)
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/istoriya.png)
History, 19.12.2020 21:30
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/ap.png)
Advanced Placement (AP), 19.12.2020 21:30
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/en.png)
English, 19.12.2020 21:30
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/mat.png)
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/mat.png)
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/en.png)
English, 19.12.2020 21:30