How does the use of multiple points of view affect the reader’s interpretation? Both points of view show that Cherokee who had converted to Christianity did not know that their land would be taken, while other Cherokee saw it clearly.
The first point of view shows the government’s role in taking Cherokee land away, while the second point of view shows religion’s role.
The first point of view shows that the Cherokee were secretly planning to fight the soldiers, while the second point of view shows that the Cherokee were cooperating with them.
Both points of view show that the Cherokee people held on to Christianity to get them through the march.

HURRY UP PLEASE

Read this excerpt from "the light of gandhi's lamp" by hilary kromberg inglis, in which she describes driving to the police station where her sister is being detained. to avoid looking at the blackened windows at the top of the building and thinking about the history of who had died or been tortured there, i always looked instead at the little chinese restaurant on the opposite side of the road. how does this passage affect the text? it conveys, with great subtlety, the conflict she felt over having a sister who would break the law and end up in the custody of the police. it conveys, without any implied moral judgment, that those who fought against apartheid considered themselves to be soldiers in a just war. it conveys, with an extended metaphor, the idea that being detained by the police in this society was regarded as a badge of honor. it conveys, with direct language, the view held by many anti-apartheid activists that the police often acted in brutal and unlawful ways.