Read the excerpt from "Harriet Tubman: A Life of Toil and Triumph." By this time, the word of Harriet Tubman’s bravery was beginning to spread. Many well-known people learned of her mission and got on board as well. Writers Ralph Waldo Emerson and Louisa May Alcott helped her, as did Susan B. Anthony. Some even allowed her to use their homes as stations. Meanwhile, Harriet’s fame also made her a target, and a large reward was offered for her capture and return to Maryland. The beginning of the Civil War in 1861 marked the end of Harriet’s Railroad work, but she did not retire. Instead, she joined the fight that would soon set all of her people free. At the request of Union leaders, she set out for South Carolina. There she nursed slaves who had been left behind when their owners fled Northern forces. Why was a reward offered for Tubman’s capture?

A. because she fled to South Carolina

B. because many people opposed her work

C.

B. Because many people opposed her work

Explanation:

According to the excerpt given, Harriet Tubman was an abolitionist that was greatly admired and respected by many for her work in helping slaves escape through her railway network.

She is described as being a frontrunner and was also vital in securing freedom for the slaves and had a lot of friends and admirers, but also had enemies and as a result, when she went to South Carolina, there was a reward for her capture because many people opposed her work

no,

explanation:

because they are likely to use their corrupted thought process to get what they want. not what is better for the another reason they shouldn't is since they abused their rights as a us citizen they should have certain rights stripped away from them as punishment, such as the right to vote. due to the lack of proper behavior exemplified   from their actions , it would be hard for people to trust them because of their criminal record.   either directly (in the case of a referendum or ballot initiative) or indirectly (by choosing lawmakers and law enforcers). in fact, we do have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility and commitment to our laws that we require people to meet before they are given a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. people who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don’t meet those standards. and those crimes can include such “non-violent felonies” as, say, treason and espionage, or voter fraud and public corruption, white-collar crime and felonies merely “concerning drugs” — like trafficking in fentanyl-laced heroin and selling it to minors, for example. if you’re not willing to follow the law, then you should not have a role in making the law for everyone else.

this is what i put and it was correct

it's a way for authors to communicate with reader in this time period. books from the past can teach us about life.