When the author’s friends suggest that some cultures might consider poetry a luxury, the author.. A. states that her friends are incorrectly labeling and generalizing a population.
B. dismisses her friends’ claims as unfounded and false.
C. gives examples of how this issue can be overcome.
D .admits that this is perhaps true.

B. Dismisses her friends claims as unfounded and false.

Explanation:

Poetry is not a luxury. It is considered as soul satisfaction. The poetry provides author with a self satisfaction and condoles his heart.The author rejects the claim of his friend that a poetry is a luxury. The authors considers poetry as a normal and he does not level the poetry as luxury.

the correct answer is "dissent"

explanation:

because dissent is when one or more judges express disagreement with the majority in court, in specific legal systems.   an   argument in opposition is presented to the court, with a different interpretation, or application.

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.