Which strategy is best for the negative position to use to create a strong rebuttal against the affirmative position? explaining that the tax will not make a significant difference in the amount of plastic waste
presenting the idea that the improved environment is worth the extra taxes and asking a follow-up question
explaining that the source used by the affirmative position is unreliable and suggesting an alternative source
presenting the plastic-tax argument in a different way by stating that it would be an unnecessary burden for people

Read the excerpt from "home front diary." jimmy simmons stopped by today to tell me that he had enlisted in the army. he asked me if i would write to him, and i said i would. i told him that i've been writing to my uncle arthur and susan's cousin john for about a year, and as an experienced correspondent i had some advice about all the censorship. "don't write down any information about your location or the number of soldiers in your unit because the censors will cut all of that away," i said. "in my experience, loose lips not only sink ships, they make letters look like snowflake decorations! ” well, he belly laughed over that one. how is the author's perspective different from jimmy's? the author has been to war and she can give jimmy advice. jimmy has become a soldier and does not believe the author’s advice. the author has experience writing to soldiers but jimmy does not. jimmy has more experience at letter writing than the author.