subject
English, 08.10.2020 05:01 mhzperfect

Write a response that evaluates a group discussion. Assignment Prompt
In this assignment, you will have a discussion with at least two peers. Your discussion will be planned on a topic that all participants have researched. You will then write an evaluation of your experience of planning, speaking, and listening. You will complete the assignment by submitting your response.
Assignment Instructions
Step 1: Work collaboratively to set discussion rules and guidelines.
a) Meet with other participants before the discussion to develop a plan. b) Confirm that the team knows the topic and text(s) that will be the basis of the discussion. c) Set clear goals with the team that include deadlines for preparation, the schedule of the discussion, the length of the discussion, and the roles of each discussion member. d) With the aid of a teacher or other adult, decide on how the role of the moderator will function. e) Determine the purpose of the discussion and the audience. f) Decide on the formality of the discussion and rules for consensus, vote-taking, and the presentation of alternate viewpoints.
Step 2: Prepare your evidence.
a) Read the text and any additional texts needed for you to thoroughly understand the topic. b) Gather facts, examples, and anecdotes about the topic, and cite your sources. c) Determine your viewpoint based on your opinion of the facts you have gathered. d) Take notes to organize your viewpoint with evidence that supports each main idea. e) Research definitions for any terms and concepts you plan to present during the discussion.
Step 3: Participate in a formal group discussion.
a) Come to the discussion prepared. b) Take turns listening and speaking. c) Use notes from your research to present your viewpoint. d) Support each point you make with evidence. e) Listen to questions raised by the moderator and other participants. Respond thoughtfully. f) Take notes as you listen. Reflect on points made, summarize perspectives, and build on ideas. g) Acknowledge where you agree and disagree with others, and, when you need to, justify your views based on the reasoning presented. h) Help the group stay focused on the topic. i) Speak clearly, using an appropriate volume, rate of speech, and formal language. j) Keep eye contact as you speak and listen.

Student Guide (continued)
Copyright © Edgenuity Inc.
k) Use body language to show that you are engaged in the discussion and interacting as part of a team.
Step 4: Reflect on the group discussion.
a) Think about how you acted as a speaker in presenting your views. b) Consider how well you listened and followed the ground rules of the discussion. c) Reflect on how other participants made their points and provided evidence. d) Take notes on your overall impressions of how effectively the group discussed the topic.
Step 5: Prepare a written response that evaluates the group discussion.
a) Using a word-processing program, write a two- to three-paragraph evaluation of the discussion. b) Include responses to these questions in your evaluation:
 What did you do to prepare for the discussion? How well prepared were you?  What rules were created for the discussion? Were they followed?  How well did you present your viewpoint?  How did your own perspective affect the way you presented your views? Explain.  How successful were you at listening and responding to other group members?  How did you use evidence to explain and defend your views, including when someone disagreed with you?  In what ways did other participants use reasoning and evidence to make their points?  Were there any times when someone did not use evidence or when the evidence did not match the viewpoint presented? Did a participant exaggerate or distort information? Explain.  Was there a time when someone’s perspective differed from your own? How did that person’s perspective influence his or her viewpoint? Explain.  How did you respond to perspectives that differed from your own?  How was your language grammatically correct and appropriate to the topic, purpose, and audience? Give an example.  What kinds of hand gestures and facial expressions did you and other people use to match what was being said?  How did you use eye contact, the volume of your voice, or other means to connect with others during the discussion?  How well did the group solve problems and come to consensus?  Overall, how effective was the group discussion?
Step 6: Revise and submit your written response.
a) Read over your response to make sure that you have addressed each question completely. b) Revise, edit, and save your written response. c) Submit your response. Congratulations on completing your evaluation

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 21.06.2019 14:30, saltyclamp
"this is just to say" by william carlos williams, which of these poetic devices does this poem most represent?
Answers: 3
image
English, 21.06.2019 19:50, ashanty45
Prior to researching, a writer should a. create an outline b. cite sources c. compose a draft d. create research questions select the best answer from the choices provided a b c d the answer is d
Answers: 2
image
English, 22.06.2019 01:00, nathanowens121224
Which verb or verb phrase signals an inappropriate shift in mood. a) will you let b) should first change c) must attend d) will be served
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 01:30, angelasequen5656
Create a well-crafted essay of 1-2 pages outlining a likely theory of king tutankhamun’s death at the age of nineteen. your goal is to convince peers your age that this is the most reasonable theory according to the evidence. incorporate the subjunctive and conditional moods within your writing. use the following rubric to guide your writing. remember to check your spelling (by using a spell checker and also against the original text) to ensure the proper spelling of names and places in king tut’s world. reminder: spell checkers are great, but they’re not always right. think about terms specific to egypt or even tutankhamun’s name. a spell checker won’t know if you’re spelling these correctly, so check with the reading to keep consistent. rubric criterion exceptional capable developing beginning points earned ideas & content main claim supporting details sources are cited clear, focused, interesting ideas with appropriate detail, sources are cited evident main idea with some support which may be general or limited, sources are mentioned main idea may be unclear; supporting detail is vague or off topic, some source information used central idea or theme is not stated; supporting detail may be nonexistent, no sources mentioned organization structure (claim/counterclaim) introduction conclusion strong organization; seamless paragraph transitions; effective and engaging intro and conclusion organization is appropriate but conventional; attempt at introduction and conclusion attempts at organization, inappropriate use of lists or bullets; introduction and conclusion are not developed no introduction or conclusion; no clear organizational framework or transitions voice personality sense of audience appropriate to audience; expressive, engaging, sincere voice is appropriate to topic, but inconsistent or dry voice may be inappropriate; writing may seem mechanical writer’s voice is inappropriate or nonexistent word choice precision effectiveness imagery broad range of descriptive words; creative examples, vivid details and images language is functional and appropriate; descriptions may lack detail or be overdone words may be correct but simplistic; no attempt at detail, description, or examples word choice is limited, words are often misused; supporting detail and examples are nonexistent sentence fluency rhythm, flow variety easy flow and rhythm; good variety in length and structure sentences are appropriate but lack variety and length awkward phrasing and structure, similar patterns and choppy language sentences are incomplete or difficult to follow, language is confusing conventions age appropriate spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar strong use of correct conventions; errors are few and minor most writing conventions correct; occasional high profile errors frequent errors; most do not interfere with readability frequent errors interfere with readability
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Write a response that evaluates a group discussion. Assignment Prompt
In this assignment, yo...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 22.09.2019 17:00
Konu
History, 22.09.2019 17:00