The last section of the story is a flash forward. Readers must infer what happens in the intervening time between Sergei’s conversation with the fish and Yoni’s final report on his video. Is this structure effective, or would it have been better to know the details about Sergei’s decision? Explain.

This structure is effective.

Explanation:

As we can see in the question above, the last section of the story happens in an accelerated way, causing a reflection of the bed about the conversation of sergei with the fish and the final report of yoni in his video. This type of structure is totally effective, because it leaves the reader prompted to find facts that will allow him to reach a conclusion for himself and find out if Sergei's decision was correct and if it was effective that she used her last request to save Yoni.

what motivates odysseus to tell a lie to the cyclops

sensory details?

so i`m assuming you are writing something from a bats (the animal) point of view. if this is the case, you can use sights, sounds, feelings, and tastes.

and idk what you mean by domain, but all of the sensory details will depend on where the bat is.

a bat doesn't see color very well, so its surroundings will be dulled.

it can hear super well. so maybe it can hear the insects on the ground

feelings. you can imagine how a bat would feel from its perspective. it all depends on where it lives.

maybe it can taste the salt in the air, or smell water, or something. all of these details are completely dependent on where it is located.

hope this .