In this by-place of nature, there abode, in a remote period of American history, that is to say, some thirty years since, a worthy wight of the name of Ichabod Crane; who sojourned, or, as he expressed it, "tarried," in Sleepy Hollow, for the purpose of instructing the children of the vicinity.
He was a native of Connecticut; a State which supplies the Union with ploneers for the mind as well as for the forest, and sends forth yearly its
legions of frontier woodsmen and country schoolmasters. The cognomen of Crane was not inapplicable to his person. He was tall, but exceedingly
lank, with narrow shoulders, long arms and legs, hands that dangled a mile out of his sleeves, feet that might have served for shovels, and his whole
frame most loosely hung together.
(from "The Legend of Sleepy Hollow" by Washington Irving)
Ichabod Crane was said to have "sojourned," or, as he put it, "tarried" in Sleepy Hollow.
Which is the meaning of these words?
O 1. traveled quickly
O 3. explored extensively
O 2. resided temporarily
O 4. spent lavishly

So my guess is "Spent lavishly"

Explanation:

I think its "spent Lavishly" cause you have to look up the meaning of the last word like for instance tarried means,slow and prolonging  so that gives you the answer or part of it.(depend on how you look at it) So hopefully its "spent lavishly" but if not it should be "explored extensively"

I hope this kinda helped ! :D

imparadis't in one anothers arms  

the happier eden, shall enjoy their fill  

of bliss on bliss, while i to hell am thrust,  

where neither joy nor love, but fierce desire,  

among our other torments not the least,  

still unfulfill'd with pain of longing pines;  

yet let me not forget what i have gain'd  

from their own mouths; all is not theirs it seems:  

one fatal tree there stands of knowledge call'd,  

forbidden them to taste: knowledge forbidd'n?  

suspicious, reasonless. why should their lord  

envie them that? can it be sin to know,

the correct answer is "dissent"

explanation:

because dissent is when one or more judges express disagreement with the majority in court, in specific legal systems.   an   argument in opposition is presented to the court, with a different interpretation, or application.