« Food and Drink » What restaurant would you recommend around the place you live? Why is it a good place? What is your opinion about eating out? What food do you prefer most: homemade or take-away?

Explanation:

I think you could pretty much pick a restaurant with you prefer, there are definitely a lot.

Why do you think it's a good place.

This boils down to a number of factors such as,

The food they have

The way they treat customers

The attitude and professionalism of their waiters.

The location of the restaurant itself, how close or far it is to your house.

The environment that surrounds the restaurant, is it serene like you love, noisy or quiet as a graveyard.

Also, other services the restaurant has for the customers.

Above listed are some of the reasons why you could prefer a particular restaurant to others in your environment, and why you think it's a good place.

What is your opinion about eating out?

This is very dependent also, personally, I prefer homemade to eating out. Of course I do eat out oftentimes, when I'm just tired, or when I just craze the cooking from a particular restaurant, but homemade gives me the absolute power to know what and what are added to the food I intend to eat, and eat to my satisfaction moreso.

type of error:

the error in the sentence is a "dangling modifier". a dangling modifier is a phrase, word or clause that "dangles" because there is not target to modify. in this case, "after mopping the floor" is the dangling modifier since it has no word to modify. the noun "house" cannot mop the floor; therefore there is a mistake in the writing of the sentence.

the first proposition is to question economic materialism and victorian christianity. the lines are:

“it moves us not.—great god! i'd rather be

a pagan suckled in a creed outworn; ”

wordsworth is stating that nature no longer interests mankind, that the latter is not “moved” by it and explains that ancient western paganism had a more positive attitude concerning nature since it lacked the perv erted judaeo-christian interpretation of having received the world and all its animals and elements from god to use as we , instead of humans actually being not only part of nature but its wardens, meant to appreciate it and protect it.

the next lines are:

“so might i, standing on this pleasant lea,

have glimpses that would make me less forlorn;

have sight of proteus coming from the sea;

or hear old triton blow his wreathed horn.”

wordsworth here make it very clear that by actually looking and contemplating nature, human beings would reconnect with happiness, serenity and purpose. the use of mythological figures is quite evocative as well, proteus is a greek mythological god of the changing sea. he personifies the sea that changes, which symbolizes the way nature changes and inevitably can change to be destructive not only due to natural causes but to human pollution. furthermore, the sea is even more symbolic since all life originated in the sea so it is not only our past but our future since no life form in our planet can survive without water and if all water is destroyed in earth all life will be gone as well.

he then uses triton which is symbolic of the synthesis of both nature and mankind. triton is a mythological greek god that has the upper body of a man and the lower body of a fish (a merman). this human fish duality evokes the fact that humans are not only human but also part of nature, the fish tail representing nature. the main attribute of this god was that he used a conch shell as a horn to calm the roaring seas. in other words, triton uses nature through science for the benefit of human sailors who risk death during tempests. with the use of such metaphor, wordworth is conveying the message that human technology   is supposed to use nature to preserve nature and thereby humanity as well.