The author says, "the chilling truth is that [Wes's] story could have been mine. The tragedy is that my story could have been his." To what extent do you think that's true? What might have prevented their stories from being interchangeable? Back up your claim with reasoning or specific examples. *

Which best compares the authors’ purposes in silent spring and “save the redwoods”? both authors want readers to protect human rights. both authors want readers to focus on saving trees. both authors intend to entertain readers with their essays. both authors intend to convince readers of their viewpoint.