subject
English, 17.08.2020 02:01 Rainbowface33

But there was one thing that was worse. I discovered that the dragon had put a charm on me: No weapon could cut
me. I could walk up to the hall whenever I pleased, and
they were powerless. My heart became darker because of
that. Though I scorned them, sometimes hated them, there
had been something between myself and men when we
could fight. Now, invulnerable, I was as solitary as one live
tree in a vast landscape of coal.

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 21.06.2019 13:30, billey32
Which of these details is not relevant to the paragraph? jane addams was born in cedarville, illinois, in 1860. as the daughter of well-off mill owner, jane always had her needs cared for. while she traveled through england in her late twenties, she and her friend, ellen g. starr, traveled to a house where poor people could sleep, eat, and learn. inspired by this, jane and ellen started a similar establishment, called hull house, in chicago, illinois. people living in the city could get a meal, learn, and rest at hull house. the founders soon became famous for their work, and their efforts many poor people in chicago. for her work, jane was awarded the nobel peace prize in 1931.
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 07:00, heybro12
Which sentence is an example of objective, third-person writing that could be found in a scientific essay? a. i was 15 years old when i developed an eating disorder. b. my sister developed an eating disorder when she was a teenager. c. eating disorders often appear during the teen years. d. you are most likely to develop eating disorders during your teenage years.
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 08:00, hayesvolcano
Saved in marigolds, what do the following lines from the passage mainly reveal about lizabeth? suddenly i was ashamed, and i did not like being ashamed. the child in me sulked and said it was all in fun, but the woman in me flinched at the thought of the malicious attack that i had led.
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 12:40, adrian128383
Question 4 of 20 2 points which best explains why the delivery of william faulkner's nobel prize speech does not support its rhetoric and purpose? o a. the manner in which he speaks does not match the confidence of the message. o b. the language is too lofty and poetic for the purpose of the speech. o c. the purpose is to congratulate, but the delivery fails in its missionn. o d. the southern accent makes it difficult for the listener to understand submit
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
But there was one thing that was worse. I discovered that the dragon had put a charm on me: No weap...

Questions in other subjects: