subject
English, 17.07.2020 20:01 cdyshaylia55

A brainlest to who can get this right read the following passage and the answer the questions that follows the second amendment to the us constitution which is a frequent source of controversy in public dabates says that "a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. "the controversy stems from the fact that some Americans feel that the second amendment grantees all citizens the absolute right to own firearms while others believe that some restrictions on gun ownership are consistent with the second amendment A. "shall not be infringed."

B. "the second amendment guarantees"

C. "the controversy stems from:

D. "consistent with the second amendment."

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 22.06.2019 09:30, Lianabel0517
In the first line of the poem, the poet likens himself to a natural object, a cloud. in contrast, the last line of the second stanza, "tossing their heads in sprightly dance," personifies daffodils, which are natural objects. what do these two devices together suggest?
Answers: 3
image
English, 22.06.2019 09:50, ciel8809
Write a speech about a current practice - anything people commonly do in society today - that you think the people of the future will see as a form of discrimination. what are some practices that are legal today that you think limit people's rights? do you yourself feel you're being treated unfairly? you'll support your ideas with evidence you find through research. you'll also enhance your speech with audio or video.
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 13:10, jfleming733
Which sentence is punctuated correctly? the shoes normally cost 40 dollars, however; we got them on sale. the shoes normally cost 40 dollars however we got them on sale. the shoes normally cost 40 dollars, however, we got them on sale. the shoes normally cost 40 dollars; however, we got them on sale.
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 14:00, gabriellabadon2
Read the passage from the opinion of the court in dred scott v. sandford, written by justice taney. the question then arises, whether the provisions of the constitution, in relation to the personal rights and privileges to which the citizen of a state should be entitled, embraced the negro african race, at that time in this country, or who might afterwards be imported, who had then or should afterwards be made free in any state; and to put it in the power of a single state to make him a citizen of the united states, and endue him with the full rights of citizenship in every other state without their consent? does the constitution of the united states act upon him whenever he shall be made free under the laws of a state, and raised there to the rank of a citizen, and immediately clothe him with all the privileges of a citizen in every other state, and in its own courts? the court thinks the affirmative of these propositions cannot be maintained. and if it cannot, the plaintiff in error could not be a citizen of the state of missouri, within the meaning of the constitution of the united states, and, consequently, was not entitled to sue in its courts. what claim does justice taney make in this passage? that sanford has the right to enslave scott that scott has the right to be emancipated that scott is not a citizen of missouri that sanford cannot sue because he is not a citizen
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
A brainlest to who can get this right read the following passage and the answer the questions that f...

Questions in other subjects: