What does a slippery slope fallacy do? A. It overstates or exaggerates an opponents's claims. B. It attacks the character of the opponent rather than dealing with the issue. C. It uses celebrities or famous names to support an argument. D. It makes conclusions based upon information that is false.

I don't really like the options it gives but, the slippery slope fallacy is when someone uses an event as an example and explains how it could lead to very unfortunate scenarios. For example, if we allow X to happen, X can lead to Y which can lead to Z. Then that means if X happens, it will cause Z. I would say the closest answer with the options given would be A.

Explanation:

nobody can deny that cars are the most used means of transport all over the world. however owing a car could have some disadvantages. first of all, having a car on your own allows you to go everywhere without depending on timetables. moreover, you can use it whenever you need it no matter the time or the climate conditions. furthermore, if you have a car, you would not have to wait for nobody to share it when going to somewhere. nevertheless, one major disadvantages of owing a car is the fact that fuel is very expensive nowadays so that not everyone can afford it. in addition, you have to pay insurance to be protected by legal conditions. apart from this, the person who owns a car always has to maintain the car and repair any mechanical problem which could costs a huge amount of money. what is more, if you have to travel long distances, and you do not like driving, one probably would be exhausted and irritated due to driving for a long time. besides, cars cause environmental pollution. to sum up, owing a car means that you have more freedom to travel whenever and wherever people want to, however the car maintenance could be a very expensive issue that can have bad consequences at your economy.

bah and ahbahaahbahabahaha