Read the excerpt from "Take the Tortillas Out of Your Poetry." For me, reading has always been a path toward liberation and fulfillment. To learn to read is to start down the road
of liberation, a road which should be accessible to everyone. No one has the right to keep you from reading, and yet
that is what is happening in many areas in this country today. There are those who think they know best what we
should read. These censors are at work in all areas of our daily lives.
Which best describes the rhetoric used in this excerpt to increase the reader's awareness of censorship?
factual evidence is used to appeal to the reader's sense of logic
a strong opinion is presented to appeal to the reader's sense of justice
an emotional anecdote is related to appeal to the reader's sympathy
the author's love of reading is referenced to appeal to his character

Explanation:

The word rhetoric refers to the act of persuading or convincing someone about a specific idea during writing or speeches by showing one's ideas are valid and true. For doing this, there are multiple techniques that can be used and include using facts or statistics; appeal to the logic of the reader; taking advantage of the emotions of the reader; telling a personal anecdote or story and using the values of the reader. In the case presented, the author is trying to show to the readers the way reading is the path towards liberation and because of this it should not be limited or censored by someone. For doing this, the author mainly presents a strong opinion and uses expressions such as "No one has the right to keep you from reading" or "here are those who think they know best what we should read" to show the reader how unfair it is that someone wants to decide what they should read. This means the author of this excerpt uses the perception of the reader about fairness and justice to convince the reader the author proposal about censorship is valid. Thus, the rhetoric used in the excerpt to increase the reader's awareness of censorship is "a strong opinion is presented to appeal to the reader’s sense of justice". Hope that helps!!!

idk

explanation:

1. drag the central argument paine presents and its two claims to complete the chart. argument claims america may have flourished more had it not been under the power of any european country. america may have flourished under britain in the past, but there is no guarantee that it will continue to flourish in the future. america will continue to flourish as long as the essential food products it sells are bought and eaten in europe. the american colonies will no longer flourish when britain makes war against them. britain's king has shown himself to be prejudiced against the colonies, rather than wanting them to flourish.

2.select the sentence in this passage that can be classified as a false statement.

although few humans per year are attacked by polar bears, any individual attack can be terrifying and even fatal. the warming of arctic regions has allowed the intrusion of humans into the polar bears’ habitat, increasing the danger of harmful contacts. remaining alert and using precautions can humans avoid a negative encounter with a polar bear. traveling together and staying close to the group can humans avoid bear attacks. certain weapons, including nonlethal ones such as pepper spray, are effective against polar bears. once a bear has decided to attack, however, nothing can be done.

3.select the sentence in this passage that demonstrates the fallacy of making an extreme either-or claim.

the civil war was the bloodiest conflict in the history of the united states. more than 600,000 soldiers lost their lives. the fighting took place in many different cities and throughout the countryside. the wounded often suffered acute pain while in the field hospitals. they all should have asked for better care. william hammond, the surgeon general of the union army, created a new system of sanitary field care. if people do not accept hammond as the most important person from the civil war, they have no understanding of the war.