What’s the proper way to say “ain’t you got nobody”?

Don't you have anyone ?

or

Don't you have anyone else ?

Explanation:

You have nobody, don't you? or

Explanation:

It wouldn't be don't you have nobody? because technically without contractions it would mean do you not have nobody?, which is a double negative sentence, which is grammatically incorrect. So, 'You have nobody, don't you? means the same thing as 'You have nobody, do you not?, which is grammatically correct because it isn't a double negative like the first one. It's stating that you have nobody, and then asking if that statement is correct.

may i see the historical information and the excerpt?

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.