Read the sentence. If someone refuses to learn how to do something, people will never develop new skills, and will struggle to get through life. Which word or phrase best replaces the underlined part of the sentence to remove a logical fallacy? that person the public students children

The word or phrase which best replaces the underlined part of the sentence to remove the logical fallacy is:

that person.

Explanation:

Even though there isn't any underlined word in the sentence, it can safely be assumed that the word would be "people". A fallacy exist in using "people" because, before, the speaker began by talking about "someone".

Someone is just one person. How then did we go from one person to many people? Why is it that this particular someone not learning something results in many people never developing skills? There is flawed reasoning here. Therefore, to correct it and to remove the logical fallacy, we have to keep the sentence as specific as it was from the beginning.

Hence, it should be that "If someone refuses to learn how to do something, that person will never develop new skills, and will struggle to get through life".

honetly   i have no idea. i need points so i dont have to subcribe sp i can finish a test

at the beginning of the story, elisa just has the small idea of wanting more attention, but as the story progressed, her desire for more attention grew larger. before she talked to the man with the wagon she was just focused on her chrysanthemums but when she talked to him and got some attention she enjoyed it, so she decided to get all dolled up for henry. but when they were on the way to dinner she was so upset because she saw the flowers on the side of the road and realized the man didn't take interest in her like she thought.