2. PART B: Which detail from the text best
supports the answer to Part A?
A “From an evolutionary point of view,
altruism doesn't seem to make any sense.
According to the modern Neo-Darwinian
view, human beings are basically selfish.”
(Paragraph 2)
OB "Of course, we felt an instinct to help other
members of our group, because our own
survival depended on the safety of the group
as a whole, and because, more indirectly, this
would support the survival of our genes.”
(Paragraph 4)
OC "Or, more seriously, perhaps it was the result
of moral conditioning, a respect for living
things and an impulse to 'do good' which was
ingrained in me by my parents?" (Paragraph

that's conceptually impossible.

if i wrote it, it wouldn't be a 'shakespeare' sonnet.

normally working animals are domesticated and ruled by a master, a domesticator (tamer), to perform basic and important functions on a farm, for example. the value used in this context is animal labor in exchange for food. it is not so much a contrast to the story told by napoleon and the pigs, since the animals of that particular farm also performed functions on the farm through domestication. the only thing is that in this case, who rules them is a pig, also an animal, but very respected, to whom the other animals lent him submission. that's about a strong relationship of dependency between animal and owner.

the dog listens to mr miller