1. Prepare a second opening argument.

2. Navigate back to the evidence chart and find a piece of evidence that you didn’t use in the opening argument you wrote in class.

3. Use this second piece of evidence to write another opening argument about why the narrator should be judged sane or insane.

4. You may begin your argument with the following statement or write your own:
It is absolutely clear that the defendant was sane/insane when he committed this crime. The evidence I am about to describe will prove this beyond a doubt.

Read the excerpt from a student’s journal. i thought it would be stressful having to participate in a debate for my final exam. but with a partner to , it was actually a nice change of pace. we argued our case thoroughly, presenting lots of evidence. we even got to use the rebuttal we’d rehearsed. well, a year’s worth of research really paid off. which phrase from the passage best supports the conclusion that the student is describing a policy debate? argued our case thoroughly presenting lots of evidence the rebuttal we’d rehearsed a year’s worth of research

Describe the various instances that depict candace lapidus as an archetype for any academician from the lesson gogol's first day.

Read the following passage: he roamed from chamber to chamber with hurried, unequal, and objectless step. the pallor of his countenance had assumed, if possible, a more ghastly hue— but the luminousness of his eye had utterly gone out. the once occasional huskiness of his tone was heard no more; and a tremulous quaver, as if of extreme terror, habitually characterized his utterance. there were times, indeed, when i thought his unceasingly agitated mind was laboring with some oppressive secret, to divulge which he struggled for the necessary courage. which of the above ideas might be considered foreshadowing? he is wandering all over the chamber his skin tone is really pale his voice is quivering the narrator thinks he is laboring with an oppressive secret