English, 24.05.2020 22:58 Hardydonotmess1

How does the author balance the suspense of scene 4 with the sadness of scene 5?

Answers: 3

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: Bssnk

According to a different source, this question refers to the play The Diary of Anne Frank.

In scenes 4 and 5 of Act 1, the author is able to achieve a balance between a feeling of suspense in scene 4 with a feeling of sadness in scene 5.

In scene 4, suspense is introduced through the device of Anne's nightmares. We learn that Anne dreamt that her family was captured by the "green police." This nightmare introduces foreshadowing. The author builds suspense by suggesting that Anne's family will indeed be captured at some point.

This suspense of scene 4 is followed by the sadness of scene 5. This occurs when it is time to celebrate Hanukkah in the Annex. In the middle of the celebration, a noise is heard downstairs, which leads everyone to believe that they are about to be captured. This establishes a clear link with the suspense of the previous scene. The reader is able to link this situation with that of Anne's nightmare, thus balancing the two events in his mind. Eventually, the families realize that a robber came in and most likely heard them. They worry about the robber going to the police and informing them of the Annex. As now they are fearful about being captured, the rest of their Hanukkah is a sad affair.

Answer from: Quest

explanation:

Answer from: Quest

Cain was a man from the bible. cain and abel were brothers but cain was extremely jealous of able and while abel was in the fields gathering wheat (i think that's what he was doing) cain came behind him and killed him. genesis 4: 2 now abel kept flocks, and cain worked the soil. 3 in the course of time cain brought some of the fruits of the soil as an offering to the lord.4 and abel also brought an offering—fat portions from some of the firstborn of his flock. the lord looked with favor on abel and his offering, 5 but on cain and his offering he did not look with favor. so cain was very angry, and his face was downcast.

6 then the lord said to cain, “why are you angry? why is your face downcast? 7 if you do what is right, will you not be accepted? but if you do not do what is right, sin is crouching at your door; it desires to have you, but you must rule over it.”

8 now cain said to his brother abel, “let’s go out to the field.” while they were in the field, cain attacked his brother abel and killed him.

i hope this you! : )

Other questions on the subject: English

English, 21.06.2019 18:00, ewalchloe5067920

How would you write "the fourth of july? " the 4th of july or the fourth of july? are they both grammatically correct?

Answers: 2

continue

English, 21.06.2019 20:00, shanekamayo9900

Match the term to its description. an elder masquerading as an1. agbalailancestral spirit2. egwugwuan evil spirit which constantlyreincarnates itself in the wombmurder or manslaughter3. ochu4. ogbanjea woman or a man without a title

Answers: 1

continue

English, 22.06.2019 04:40, dahloli4442

Demonstrating understanding of jem's development one way to demonstrate understanding of character and theme is by writing from the perspective of a character. for this assignment, compose a short poem from the perspective of jem. your poem should detail his feelings about either a. his father, atticus or b. mrs. dubose. the poem must accurately trace the progression of jem's attitudes and beliefs, highlighting the important events and shifts in his perspective detailed above. your writing should also sound like jem, using voice and word choice that reflects the voice and word choice found in the novel. the poem can be a free poem (meaning it does not need to rhyme or follow a particular format). it should be a minimum of twenty-lines in length, have a title, and follow conventional rules of spelling, grammar, and punctuation.

Answers: 2

continue

English, 22.06.2019 08:50, heroxtree

Which of these best explains why the argument in this passage is weak? (5 points) the argument doesn't take into account opposing points of view. the argument relies on attacking a weak version of the opposition. the claim is not valid. the argument relies on claims that are not backed up by facts.