subject
English, 21.05.2020 13:57 kraigstlistt

HURRY 10 MIN LEFT

Stephon is writing an essay that compares and contrasts characters from two different texts. The two characters he is comparing and contrasting are Manjiro from Heart of a Samurai and William, the narrator of The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind. One similarity he notes is that Manjiro and William both show creativity.

Which details from the texts suggest that both William and Manjiro are creative?

William harnesses the wind to create electricity; Manjiro develops a way to cook food without fire.

William finds a way to learn without attending school; Manjiro creates a more effective way of husking rice.

William works very hard to build his own windmill; Manjiro devises a plan to get himself and the others home.

William uses sun and mirrors to create fire; Manjiro finds a way to escape the "barbarians."

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 22.06.2019 06:00, alexmarche8637
What is the following animals could fly over mount ernest
Answers: 3
image
English, 22.06.2019 11:00, recannon02
Which is the best contrast between the heracles myth and christopher reeve's life story? a. the mythical heracles and christopher both endured many trials calling on their reserves of strength and character. b. christopher reeve was injured on a horse, but heracles fought a bear. c. heracles' journey into the dark world of the afterlife pales beside christopher reeve's real-life struggle against grief and depression. d. heracles wasn't real but christopher reeve was.
Answers: 3
image
English, 22.06.2019 13:00, noahdwilke
The tone of the speech most expressive the feeling of gratitude triumph acceptance frustration
Answers: 2
image
English, 22.06.2019 14:00, gabriellabadon2
Read the passage from the opinion of the court in dred scott v. sandford, written by justice taney. the question then arises, whether the provisions of the constitution, in relation to the personal rights and privileges to which the citizen of a state should be entitled, embraced the negro african race, at that time in this country, or who might afterwards be imported, who had then or should afterwards be made free in any state; and to put it in the power of a single state to make him a citizen of the united states, and endue him with the full rights of citizenship in every other state without their consent? does the constitution of the united states act upon him whenever he shall be made free under the laws of a state, and raised there to the rank of a citizen, and immediately clothe him with all the privileges of a citizen in every other state, and in its own courts? the court thinks the affirmative of these propositions cannot be maintained. and if it cannot, the plaintiff in error could not be a citizen of the state of missouri, within the meaning of the constitution of the united states, and, consequently, was not entitled to sue in its courts. what claim does justice taney make in this passage? that sanford has the right to enslave scott that scott has the right to be emancipated that scott is not a citizen of missouri that sanford cannot sue because he is not a citizen
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
HURRY 10 MIN LEFT

Stephon is writing an essay that compares and contrasts characters fro...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Chemistry, 16.10.2020 17:01
Konu
Mathematics, 16.10.2020 17:01
Konu
Mathematics, 16.10.2020 17:01