Is the following argument a factual or moral analogy? 22. What is its conclusion? 23. What are the points of analogy on which it depends? 24. Evaluate the argument for degree and relevance of similarity between the cases: "The law should permit and regulate the recreational use of marijuana. It’s no different from alcohol which the laws does allow. When this is used within reason it provides safe enjoyment and no significant threat to health; in fact just as some moderate consumption of alcoholic drinks such as red wine has been thought to have health benefits, so also health benefits have been associated with moderate use of marijuana. It’s hard to see how the one should be treated any differently from the other."

he gives his freedom of speach

explanation:

i would like to compare these two interpretations of the crucible : 1) eric christ's interretation and wade bradford's interpretation. the main differences between there interretaions is that in the first one you can notice direct link to joseph mccarthy whereas the second one represents how the town is filled with hysteria.the second interpretation shows that author believes that the story   about puritan town in salem is based on actual events while the first example shows the sencible reference to sort of bias.

faithful servants eumaeus and philaetius:

his ragged vest then drawn aside disclosed the sign conspicuous, and the scar exposed: eager they view'd, with joy they stood amazed with tearful eyes o'er all their master gazed:

these servants know ulysses by the scar he got when he was a child - so when he showed them the mark, they immediately knew this is truly their master and they hugged him, finally starting to believe his words.

answer: 1 goes to 3

2 goes to 4

3 goes to 2

4 goes to 1

explanation: