Which analysis of the roles in the debate is correct?
Henrique acted as the negative party, since he warned
the parties about what to avoid doing wrong.
Lorenzo acted as the neutral party, since he offered
evidence disproving the resolution.
Anita acted as the affirmative party, since she offered
evidence supporting the resolution.
The teacher acted as the moderator, since she did not
offer any evidence during the debate.

This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.  

Read the description of the debate.

Henrique introduced Anita and Lorenzo and explained the rules of the debate. After Henrique stated the resolution, Anita spoke first. Though Lorenzo tried to prove Anita wrong, she stuck to her support of the resolution. After both sides had spoken, the teacher announced the winner of the debate.

Which analysis of the roles in the debate is correct?

A. Henrique acted as the negative party, since he warned the parties about what to avoid doing wrong.

B. Lorenzo acted as the neutral party, since he offered evidence disproving the resolution.

C. Anita acted as the affirmative party, since she offered evidence supporting the resolution.

D. The teacher acted as the moderator, since she did not offer any evidence during the debate.

C. Anita acted as the affirmative party, since she offered evidence supporting the resolution.

Explanation:

In a debate, one team (or person) is assigned the position of the affirmative party, which supports the resolution, and the negative party goes to the opposite team, which has to refute the resolution.

In this example, Anita expressed support for the resolution, meaning that she acted as an affirmative party for the resolution stated by Henrique.

the writer needs to avoid using abbreviations and check spelling before sharing.

i believe the correct answer is a