Evidence #1: There is no narrator in Shakespearean plays.
Evidence #2: The stage directions in Shakespearean plays are sparse.

Which option represents the best inference one could draw based upon the pieces of evidence?

Shakespeare wrote the concept of a narrator was created.
Shakespeare was more interested in language than plot.
Shakespeare replied heavily upon dialogue for characterization.
Shakespeare's plays contained little action.

Read these sentences from "the yellow wallpaper." the color is repellent, almost revolting; a smouldering unclean yellow, strangely faded by the slow-turning sunlight. it is dull yet lurid orange in some places, a sickly sulphur tint to others. what tone does the author create with the word choice? o a. beautiful o b. disgusted o c. happy o d. silly

List some things u like to do with everyday friends (school friends)

Using the library or the internet as a resource, locate and watch two different live production interpretations of act iii of our town. then, compare and contrast how the two interpretations represented the original play. did either of the interpretations make any changes to the original material? if so, how did it affect your experience as a viewer? did you interpret the characters any differently after watching the live productions? why or why not?