Ham.
A man may fish with the worm that hath eat of a king, and eat of the fish that hath fed of that worm.
King
What dost thou mean by this?
Ham.
Nothing but to show you how a king may go a progress through the guts of a beggar.

What point does Hamlet seem to be making in this exchange?

You never know what you may be eating.
A beggar is as good of a fisherman as a king.
Death reduces everyone, even kings, to worm food.
A fish is not particular about the worms it eats.

its repetition emphasizing that the chain is his own. sorry if i am wrong.

to kill a mockingbird basically is about a lawyer who goes against everything in a racist society like at the time of this novel, to defend a black man accused of sexual abuse. in the bible there are cases like that of joseph, who was accused by the woman of potifar, for a crime similar to that of tim robbinson, of that novel (genesis 39: 1-20). at this point we see that god also provides the escape to joseph, who was accused unjustly, but in his time, and through his attitude, his faith was not shaken, and god provided the solution. the perspective of god also written in the bible and not pay evil with evil. (ephesians 4: 32, 1 thessalonians 5: 15, 1 peter 3: 9). atticus, the lawyer, demonstrated during this lee novel, empathy, love of neighbor, understood the situation of this accused man. he went against everything in that society, and stood in favor of that man, for the injustice committed. this shows the empathy, the love taught by christ, in some passages that speak of love and justice in the sermon of the beatitudes (especially verses 6 and 7 of matthew 5).

i think the anti-race spokesman is working to achieve equality between whites and blacks and to encourage blacks to shakespeare's theory

we need to see the document to answer the question