In his work entitled "Civil Disobedience" in 1849, Henry David Thoreau said that "Unjust laws exist: shall we be content to obey
them, or shall we endeavor to amend them, and obey them until we have succeeded, or shall we transgress them at once?"
In two paragraphs, explain what Thoreau means. Do you think he is really asking a question, or do you think that he is making a
statement in the form of a question (a rhetorical question)? What, specifically, makes you think this? Finally, is there a book, film, or
play that demonstrates Thoreau's sentiment? What is it? Who are the characters, and what is the situation in the work?

it makes the person recieving the message not feel comfortable with the banana

the answer is a hoped this

"the monkey's paw" is a rare story in that the theme is actually stated in the story. sgt. maj. morris tells the whites that the old fakir who put the spell on the paw said, "fate rules people's lives and those who interfere with fate do so to their sorrow." the message is a warning, but mr. white doesn't believe it. even though sgt. maj. morris makes it clear that he tried wishing with unfortunate results and he tries to throw the paw on the fire,   mr. white makes a wish for 200 pounds only to find that he receives the money when herbert dies in a factory accident. according to the fakir, then, because mr. white had wished for something he should not have had, his son lost his life.

the second wish that mrs. white encourages him to make is for herbert's return--one week after his death. when the strange knocking begins at the door during the windy night, mr. white panicks, believing that the previously dead but still mangled herbert could have walked home from the cemetary and is now at the door. because he fears what his wife will find if she opens the door, mr. white makes his third wish--for the noise to stop.

therefore, he uses his three wishes and to his sorrow, loses his son and disappoints his wife, who fervently believed that their son was at the door. she wanted him back, regardless of his condition.

explanation: