What is the outcome of the following argument?
Premise 1: Birds have wings.
Premise 2: Helicopters have wings.
Conclusion: Helicopters are birds.

A) Valid and sound
B) Invalid
C)Invalid and unsound
D) Valid and unsound

Read the excerpt from "home front diary." jimmy simmons stopped by today to tell me that he had enlisted in the army. he asked me if i would write to him, and i said i would. i told him that i've been writing to my uncle arthur and susan's cousin john for about a year, and as an experienced correspondent i had some advice about all the censorship. "don't write down any information about your location or the number of soldiers in your unit because the censors will cut all of that away," i said. "in my experience, loose lips not only sink ships, they make letters look like snowflake decorations! ” well, he belly laughed over that one. how is the author's perspective different from jimmy's? the author has been to war and she can give jimmy advice. jimmy has become a soldier and does not believe the author’s advice. the author has experience writing to soldiers but jimmy does not. jimmy has more experience at letter writing than the author.

Would the essay be more effective in explaining the concept of dead reckoning if you knew from the beginning that ahmed is an ant?

What type of evidence is provided in lines 12-17 of king arthur’s knights to support the reason percival’s mother took him away to the countryside? statistics case studies facts logical appeals